cuband.com – If you’re into Cuban Music

I recently had a chance to work on a Cuban Music website – http://www.cuband.com – and hope that it ends up working out.  It has a pretty big catalog of Cuban Music in MP3 format and targets a small market – people that are interested in the classics from Cuba and the newest sound from a whole bunch of genres.

There don’t appear to be too many other sites like this, and certainly none that are as easy to use.  If Cuban Music is your thing, then check out cuband.com today!

(Yeah, this is a shameless plug!)

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicdigg:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicspurl:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicwists:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicsimpy:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicnewsvine:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicblinklist:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicfurl:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicreddit:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicfark:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicblogmarks:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban MusicY!:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicsmarking:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicmagnolia:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Musicsegnalo:cuband.com - If you're into Cuban Music

Rockstar Energy Drink – They’ll Sue You if you Don’t Like It

This kind of thing pisses me off.  A corporation threatens to sue a guy and make him “publicly apologize” because he expressed an opinion about an Energy Drink that they didn’t like.  They also had his Facebook account banned, and the group he started on Facebook removed.  Then, after he posted this “public apology”, they again coerced Facebook to remove his personal account, despite his public apology (which is now gone as well).

I had never heard of this drink before (and I doubt it is available where I live), but now I’ll make sure I tell people when I’m in the USA to avoid it.  Litigious bastards like this don’t deserve your business.

So, for posterity, here is his full post:

Don’t Drink Hate. BOYCOTT ROCKSTAR* my apology

Hi all,As the creator of the original “Don’t Drink Hate. BOYCOTT ROCKSTAR” group, I’ve created this group to publish a public apology and retraction as forced by the law firm representing ROCKSTAR*.But before I do, let me explain what led to this.

One month ago, my friend showed me a little article filled with quotations from Michael Savage Weiner and his son Russell Weiner. I was utterly disgusted. Then I read that Russell Weiner was the CEO of Rockstar* and his mom Janet Weiner was CFO . After more readings, I made a PERSONAL CHOICE to BOYCOTT all ROCKSTAR* products.

I made a group to let others know and be able to make a similar choice if they wanted; the group was formed and it quickly grew to over 12,000 members. In it, we put together a list of quotations from Michael Savage Weiner as well as his son that we strongly did not agree with.

We also put commonly known information such as the fact that they co-founded the extremely conservative Paul Revere society, which openly calls for actions such as “Eliminate bilingual education in all states” and “Traditional Marriage.” More easily proven information was included as well.

Then, on May 27th, I woke up unable to log into my personal Facebook account. It was disabled. This is my new account; I lost all my photos, friends and priceless memories. I sent multiple e-mails to Facebook without any response. And then upon inquiring, I found out that the facebook group was suddenly taken down without my or any of the administrators’ knowledge (As an update, as of yesterday, after my friend’s hard work with connections at Facebook they suddenly reinstated my old account. However, as happy as I am, I find this very troubling on many levels in terms, especially because I still have not yet received a satisfactory explanation.)

A few days later, I received a lawsuit threat from the law offices of Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, LLP — Robert Shapiro was one of the attorneys who successfully defended OJ Simpson.

I researched, and apparently other individuals — primarily bloggers and reporters (e.g. SF Examiner’s Kelvin, wiqaable.com, gaywired.com) had received threats of legal action as well.

Now here I am.

And I’ve been forced to make this apology.

I’ve been forced to make “an immediate public retraction…” and “apologize for the business libel you committed against ROCKSTAR.”

I’ve been “advised that ROCKSTAR will pursue all necessary legal action to redress the violations of its rights, including, without limitation, an action for general, special and exemplary damages and equitable relief.”

———————————–———–

To THE ATTN OF: ROCKSTAR* / Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, LLP

Let this group and this statement stand as evidence of an apology. As Facebook disabled the original group without my knowledge, I suggest you contact them if you want me to be able to message all the members of the original group:

I, Charles C. C. Tsai, hereby apologize for the alleged business libel that I committed against ROCKSTAR* and publicly retract, through Facebook’s own unexplained deletion, the statements from the original Facebook group.

———————————–———–

Now, I personally also apologize for the following:

I apologize for having an opinion.

I apologize that I created a group as a means to explore my FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

I apologize that the over 12,000+ individuals in that group were SILENCED WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

I apologize for STANDING UP for my communities and the communities that I consider myself an ally to.

I apologize for being DISGUSTED by the statements, beliefs, thoughts and actions of two INDIVIDUALS: ROCKSTAR* CEO Russell Weiner and his father, Michael Savage Weiner. Let me repeat, two INDIVIDUALS.

I apologize that you feel the need to THREATEN and SILENCE individuals & organizations that you know are POWERLESS in comparison to your various forms of capital.

I apologize that you seem to be confused by the semantics of the word “co-founder” in the sense that Michael Savage Weiner and his wife Janet Weiner IRREFUTABLY CO-CREATED / CO-INVENTED / CO-FOUNDED the ROCKSTAR drink alongside current CEO RUSSELL WEINER.

From ROCKSTAR*’s OWN archived WEBSITE:

“I was very fortunate to have been raised by two of the leading herbalists in the world, Dr. and Mrs. MICHAEL WEINER, Ph.D. … From my earliest walking days, I remember exploring the jungles of the South Pacific on expeditions WITH MY PARENTS. … MY FAMILY HAS taken that spirit and experience – their lifetime journey – and DEVELOPED the most complete, most unique, most powerful, and most honest energy beverage ever created: ROCKSTAR.” – CEO RUSSELL GOLDENCLOUD WEINER

http://web.archive.org/web/20021211144041/www.rockstar69.com/new/rockstar.html

After reading the above, I apologize that you, Michael Weiner Savage, feel the need to LIE, as you told the SF Chronicle in May 2009 that “I had NOTHING to do with the founding or CREATION of Rockstar.”

I apologize that legal threats WILL NOT FORCE me into SUBMISSION.

I apologize that I will not be silenced.

I apologize that the incredibly smart, strong willed and amazing individuals and communities that dislike your CEO Russell Weiner, his dad Michael Savage Weiner and his mom CFO Janet Weiner will NOT go quietly into the night and will too NOT BE SILENCED.

I apologize that I will, WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, continue to BOYCOTT ROCKSTAR* as it is MY OWN PERSONAL CHOICE TO DO SO.

And, lastly, I apologize for any additional semantically puzzling words this note may have presented. Please realize that I have sensitively taken this into consideration through capitalization and repetition.

Yours truly,

Charles C. C. Tsai

———————————–———–

For more information to further understand the context of this apology:

“the truth about rockstar”
http://www.thetruthaboutrockstar.com/

“official rockstar website”
http://www.rockstar69.com/

“michael savage banned from britain” – huffington post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/michael-savage-banned-fro_n_196631.html

“the guardian on michael savage” – the guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/may/06/michael-white-michael-savage

“dear rockstar, please don’t sue us” – wiqaable.com
http://www.wiqaable.com/2009/05/wiqaablog-dear-rockstar-please-dont-sue.html

“Rockstar Demands Retraction from Gaywired” – gaywired.com
http://gaywired.com/Article.cfm?Section=165&ID=23024

“Newsom to return $25,000 contribution from Savage’s Son” – SFGate Blog
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=40574

———————————–———–

*DISCLAIMER: This group is in no way, shape or form calling for a boycott on ROCKSTAR, the original group name is being used for identification purposes only. The ROCKSTAR* trade name, company, its employees and beyond are not affiliated with this group. Everything said/written is either my OPINION or straight quotations from other individuals apart of, represent, or are family members to the CEO of ROCKSTAR.

Duh.

PS Dear Facebook, NOTHING in this group violates your Terms of Use. Please DO NOT DELETE this group and/or DISABLE my PERSONAL FACEBOOK account AGAIN. There are NO photos containing drug use, nudity, or other graphic or sexually suggestive content are not allowed on the site, nor are photos that depict violence or that attack an individual or group. Please do not CENSOR, especially when nothing here violates your terms of agreement. I am only using the ROCKSTAR* trade name as a means to apologize to its legal firm that has demanded me to do so ON FACEBOOK. There IS A DISCLAIMER as well for this group, see above. If you delete this group, you will have violated your own terms of agreement and believe me, though I don’t have the money to, I will find a way to take legal action (just like ROCKSTAR probably did).
———————————–———–

1 Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itdigg:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itspurl:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itwists:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itsimpy:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itnewsvine:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itblinklist:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itfurl:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itreddit:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itfark:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itblogmarks:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like ItY!:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itsmarking:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itmagnolia:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like Itsegnalo:Rockstar Energy Drink - They'll Sue You if you Don't Like It

Google Hacked..?

Filed Under » Posts
Permalink » 01/31/2009: Google Hacked..?

As I was searching for some things today using Google, I noticed that more and more websites were coming up erroneously as “Malware Sites” as determined by Google. In fact, after a few minutes, EVERY site came up with “This site may harm your computer”. Check out the screenshot (notice that it says that google.com is in the list of websites that may harm your computer):

Anyway, what’s up with that? Did Google itself get hacked, or have some kind of huge server meltdown? Whatever is going on, it essentially makes Google unusable. I never thought that Google could get taken down, but it looks like they sure did. I just wonder if anyone will ever publicly acknowledge this happened.

Edit: looks like about 45 minutes later, Google is back to normal. I wonder who’s going to get fired over this little mishap?


Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:Google Hacked..?digg:Google Hacked..?spurl:Google Hacked..?wists:Google Hacked..?simpy:Google Hacked..?newsvine:Google Hacked..?blinklist:Google Hacked..?furl:Google Hacked..?reddit:Google Hacked..?fark:Google Hacked..?blogmarks:Google Hacked..?Y!:Google Hacked..?smarking:Google Hacked..?magnolia:Google Hacked..?segnalo:Google Hacked..?

Great Job

Filed Under » Posts
Permalink » 01/19/2009: Great Job

A comparison between the treatment of the Jews during the Holocaust and the treatment of the Palestinians in Gaza:

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=2510.

Wow.

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:Great Jobdigg:Great Jobspurl:Great Jobwists:Great Jobsimpy:Great Jobnewsvine:Great Jobblinklist:Great Jobfurl:Great Jobreddit:Great Jobfark:Great Jobblogmarks:Great JobY!:Great Jobsmarking:Great Jobmagnolia:Great Jobsegnalo:Great Job

SETI CUDA Client Released – Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Data

SETI finally released a CUDA client that will allow you to use your NVidia card (it has to be fairly new) to process satellite data up to 10x faster than before.  Wow!

My system seems to be doing one work unit in about 25-30 minutes now [EDIT:  Ok, that's normal I suppose.  Looks like the Linux version doesn't do any CUDA workunits yet, even though it recognizes the GPU properly.]

To get the CUDA enabled version, go here: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/cuda.php
Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datadigg:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Dataspurl:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datawists:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datasimpy:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datanewsvine:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datablinklist:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datafurl:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datareddit:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datafark:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datablogmarks:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite DataY!:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datasmarking:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datamagnolia:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Datasegnalo:SETI CUDA Client Released - Use Your GPU to Crunch Satellite Data

All-in-one Music Meta Search Engine

I’ve been working on a side project called “SongBoxx” over the last few weeks. It’s a meta search engine that searches several of the cheapest music sites out there simultaneously and produces results that are easily sortable in your browser, so you can quickly find that track or album you’ve been looking for. Not only is it a time saver, but you can also find out about music sites that you might not have known even existed – and probably find any obscure track you can think of.

I’m hoping to improve the search results over the next few weeks and add more sites to the search engine. Currently it searches over 4,000,000,000 tracks, 300,000 albums, and 162,000 artists – by far the largest search of its kind. Those numbers will probably double over the next month or so.

My goal is to search as many sites as possible so that people can quickly locate exactly what they want without having to go to ten different places to find it. The way it works is simple: you type in what you want (artist name, album name, or track name) and then it searches all of the music sites at once, compares the results for duplicates, and puts the results into a sortable table. When you next click on an artist, for example, you get all of the albums (from all websites) related to that artist. If you then click on an album you get the tracklist, the album cover image, and a list of websites that have it and how much it costs at each website. You can follow the links from the album page directly to the store that sells it.

While developing SongBoxx I’ve had the pleasure of sharpening up some python skills, learning a bit about mod_python and apache interaction (specifically the unusual caching behavior that occurs), and basically the issues you have to deal with when developing a meta search engine. I also tried some simple AJAX bits for the first time ever. AJAX is actually a lot simpler than the hype makes it out to be, and it’s certainly nothing new.

Check the site out right here.

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginedigg:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginespurl:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginewists:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginesimpy:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginenewsvine:All-in-one Music Meta Search Engineblinklist:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginefurl:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginereddit:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginefark:All-in-one Music Meta Search Engineblogmarks:All-in-one Music Meta Search EngineY!:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginesmarking:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginemagnolia:All-in-one Music Meta Search Enginesegnalo:All-in-one Music Meta Search Engine

AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?

AllOfMP3 has been under attack for the last 6 months, and it’s showing: there are practically no payment methods left to use. So what are decent alternatives to AllOfMP3? Are there any, even?

I did a little research and came up with what I think are the top alternatives. One thing is obvious: there are plenty of options out there, and finding a decent music service isn’t as hard as you might think. In the following I’ve reviewed the top six sites that I think are the best out there, and that will suit most people – possibly even better than AllOfMP3 in some ways.

LegalSounds.com

LegalSounds

For some people, just the fact that this site has it’s own download manager with search capability will make LegalSounds.com more attractive than all the other sites – in fact, this is the site I personally recommend. With a download manager, the chore of downloading and searching for tracks is made easier. Although similar in purpose as the AllOfMP3 Explorer (or AllTunes), it isn’t quite the same – for a few reasons.

First of all, the catalog is searched online – not offline – which means that you always have the latest catalog search results, without storing the database on your PC. Secondly, it obviously has a somewhat different design than the AllOfMP3 or Alltunes programs did – but it is easy to get used to.

Track prices are $0.09 for every song – the bargain of all of the inexpensive music providers online as of this writing. With such a low price, you’d think that the encoded bitrates must be low – but all tracks are between 192kbps and 320kbps – which is better than several of the other music providers out there.

Payment options include VISA, MasterCard, Diners Club or JCB and several e-wallets: WebMoney, Yandex.Dengi, Rapida, e-port, and Kredit Pilot.The site interface has a classy design, and is available in English and Russian.

LegalSounds.com also has a bonus program: for each payment of $25 or higher, you get free track downloads. For $25 you get 25 free tracks, $35 gets you 50 free tracks, on up to $100 with a total of 200 free tracks. If you use the $100 bonus option, this effectively bring your total price per track down to about $0.076 per track.


JustMusicStore.com

JustMusicStore

Perhaps the biggest selling point of JustMusicStore.com is the enormous catalog – over 159,000 albums are claimed to be online (much more than AllOfMP3 had). The extensive catalog contains lots of older tracks, too – which may make this site the holy grail for specialized listeners.

There are two “classes” of track prices: those between $0.11 and $0.15, and those between $0.28 and $0.39 – and there doesn’t seem to be any clear cut reason for a track to belong in a particular class (popular albums seem to all be in the cheap range). Your price per track depends on how much credit you purchase ($50 of credit gets you the $0.11 price, for example). You can pay with all major credit cards and PayPal, which will suit most people. The recorded bitrates are good, usually 192kbps or better. If you’re looking for the widest selection available , then this is the site for you!

JustMusicStore downloads are fast, and with the aid of an external download manager (FlashGet or the like), you’ll be good to go. This site also offers free previews of individual tracks or entire albums (albeit at lower quality).


iSOUND.be

iSOUND.ruiSOUND.be seems to be right on par with the pricing of JustMusicStore.com, but they don’t claim to have the incredible number of albums that JustMusicStore does. That probably won’t matter, since the catalog is still large (almost 60,000 albums), and the encoding rates are good (192kbps or more).

Similar to JustMusicStore, there are two “classes” of track prices: those between $0.11 and $0.15, and those between $0.28 and $0.39 – and again there doesn’t seem to be any clear cut reason for a track to belong in a particular class, although it most popular albums seem to all be in the $0.11-$0.15 range. Your price per track depends on how much credit you purchase ($50 of credit gets you the $0.11 price, for example). You can pay with all major credit cards and PayPal.

iSOUND.be also provides pre-listening to entire albums, so you can be sure you really want an Album before you purchase it. Downloads are fast, and with the aid of an external download manager (FlashGet or the like), you should have no problem managing your downloads.


MP3Sugar.com

MP3SugarPerhaps the biggest advantage of using mp3sugar.com is the large bonus offered when charging up your account: if you buy $34 worth of credits, you get an extra $10 on top of that. The fixed pricing means you may get a better deal on some albums here than other websites; however, you cannot pick the encoded bitrates of the tracks. There seems to be no default encoding rate, with some albums being encoded entirely at 192Kbps, and others using a mixture of encoding rates.

Major credit cards are accepted (VISA, Mastecard, JCB, DinersClub), but nothing else for topping up your account. If you want to use PayPal or some other more exotic payment method, you’ll have to go elsewhere.


GoMusic.ru

GoMusic

If your tastes aren’t too exotic and obscure, the catalog at GoMusic.ru will probably serve you well. With predictable pricing per song, you’ll make out better getting some larger albums here than on other websites. They accept major credit cards, but not Amex or Discover. Alternatively, you can pay with Webmoney, the PaySafeCard, UKash, or use an interesting feature that allows you to charge directly onto your home phone bill. If this kind of payment method interests you, then this site may be for you (as of this writing, no other sites offer this feature!)

Like most sites, you don’t get to choose what bitrate you’d like to have the MP3 encoded in, and there are no formats other than MP3 available. The songs are encoded at various rates (including Variable Bit Rate, or VBR). The website interface is available in either English or Russian, and seems to flow well.


MP3Search.ru


Mp3SearchA long-time player in the MP3 world, MP3Search.ru isn’t leaving the scene anytime soon. With predictable pricing per song, you’ll make out better getting some larger albums here than on other websites. They accept major credit cards, but not Amex or Discover. Alternatively, you can pay with Webmoney, the PaySafeCard, UKash, and some other less popular payment types.

Like most sites, you don’t get to choose what bitrate you’d like to have the MP3 encoded in, and there are no formats other than MP3 available. The songs are encoded at various rates (including Variable Bit Rate, or VBR). The website interface is available in either English or Russian. Downloads seem fast and the website is pretty easy to use.

5 Comments »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?digg:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?spurl:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?wists:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?simpy:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?newsvine:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?blinklist:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?furl:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?reddit:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?fark:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?blogmarks:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?Y!:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?smarking:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?magnolia:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?segnalo:AllOfMP3 Alternatives: What are the other Music sites, and how good are they?

News Filtering – the ENF

Filed Under » Posts
Permalink » 04/05/2007: News Filtering – the ENF

Not living in the US, I sometimes hear about hot news items there that permeate the airwaves that never seem to make it far outside the US. It’s hard to imagine, I guess, that most of the world doesn’t know who Anna Nicole Smith was (I didn’t either), who the latest candidate is as the next “American Idol”, or who Dick Cheney has shot at lately. It’s not that the rest of the world is somehow being censored; it’s just that in some places people recognize the difference between gossip/propaganda/frivolous titillating novelish stories and what might be considered actual news. The bias of news media outlets in the US automatically disqualifies much of the content from being re-broadcast at “news” : entertainment has taken the front seat, and so US news is generally treated as such.

I imagine it like this: the news guys here are aware of the US news reports (and probably watch them), and patiently make a list of the topics and subject matter. Then they cross most of them off, saying “This is not news, that either, that either, this is entertainment, this is just sensationalism, that’s just political blubbering, ….” until they find the few and core news stories that matter. If most people in the world don’t care about the death of a former model waning on a drug induced lifestyle, then there is a good chance that it probably isn’t actually worthy of being news.

Anyway, I’m happy about having the European News Filter (ENF) in place. It keeps my mind from growing dumber, and I don’t even come close to the likes of FOX news and the ridiculousness that sometimes appears on the tube.

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:News Filtering - the ENFdigg:News Filtering - the ENFspurl:News Filtering - the ENFwists:News Filtering - the ENFsimpy:News Filtering - the ENFnewsvine:News Filtering - the ENFblinklist:News Filtering - the ENFfurl:News Filtering - the ENFreddit:News Filtering - the ENFfark:News Filtering - the ENFblogmarks:News Filtering - the ENFY!:News Filtering - the ENFsmarking:News Filtering - the ENFmagnolia:News Filtering - the ENFsegnalo:News Filtering - the ENF

Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration

Why did we invade Iraq? Was it because, as the White House claimed, Saddam Hussein was an immediate and serious threat to America. Or did Bush mislead the public, the Congress and the UN by consistently overstating this threat?

Bush claims he was forced to to invade Iraq as a last resort. But Bush wanted to invade Iraq from the very beginning of his presidency. Many of his team came from the PNAC, a thinktank which urged the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, and pointed out the need for a “new Pearl Harbor”. “From the very first instance, it was about Iraq. It was about what we can do to change this regime,” says Ron Suskind. “Day one, these things were laid and sealed.”

This is not a situation where Bush said ten things and one of them was wrong. Basically everything Bush said about the threat from Iraq was false. He had no solid evidence of any threat but still led us into this deadly and costly war. Here are the main lies about the threat from Iraq given by Bush and Cheney:

  • Lie #1 – Uranium from Niger – Bush said “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” in his State of the Union Address. The documents supporting that statement were forged.
  • Lie #2 – Iraq and 9/11 – Bush led people to believe that Iraq was involved with 9/11 by repeatedly linking them in his speeches. This was so effective that at one point 70% of Americans actually believed Saddam was behind 9/11. Bush has since admitted that this was not true.
  • Lie #3 – Congress Knew – Bush has stated that Congress had access to all the same information that the White House had. Thus he should not be blamed for making the mistake of going to war. But Bush was briefed many times about the falsehood of various stories and this information never reached Congress. [ZNet]
  • Lie #4 – Aluminum Tubes – Bush, Cheney, Rice and Powell said that some aluminum tubes Iraq attempted to buy were intended for use in a uranium centrifuge to create nuclear weapons. These were the only physical evidence he had against Iraq. But it turns out this evidence had been rejected by the Department of Energy and other intelligence agencies long before Bush used them in his speeches. [NYTimes] [MotherJones] [CNN]
  • Lie #5 – Iraq and Al Qaeda – Bush still insists that there was a “relationship” between Iraq and Al Qaeda. But the 9/11 Commission released a report saying, among other things, that there was no “collaborative relationship” between Al Qaeda and Iraq. The nature of the relationship seems to be that Al Qaeda asked for help and Iraq refused. Al Qaeda was opposed to Saddam Hussein because Saddam led a secular government instead of an Islamic government. [ZNet] [CNN] On 9/8/06 a Senate panel reported there was no relationship. [ABC]
  • Lie #6 – Weapons of Mass Destruction – Bush insisted that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction but his “evidence” consisted mostly of forged documents, plagiarized student papers, and vague satellite photos. The United Nations was on the ground in Iraq and could find nothing. After extensive searches Bush was finally forced to admit that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
  • Lie #7 – Mobile Weapons Labs – Bush and his team repeatedly claimed that Iraq possessed mobile weapons labs capable of producing anthrax. Colin Powell showed diagrams of them at his speech before the UN to justify invading Iraq. These claims originated from Curveball, a discredited Iraqi informer who fed Bush many of the stories related to WMD. On May 29, 2003, two small trailers matching the description were found in Iraq. A team of bio-weapons experts examined the trailers and concluded they were simply designed to produce hydrogen for weather balloons. But, for over a year, Bush claimed these were part of Iraq’s bio-weapons program. The expert’s report was suppressed and only recently made public. [WashPost] [ABC]

Bush wanted so much to convince people of the need to invade Iraq that the White House set up a secret team in the Pentagon to create evidence. The Office of Special Plans routinely rewrote the CIA’s intelligence estimates on Iraq’s weapons programs, removing caveats such as “likely,” “probably” and “may” as a way of depicting the country as an imminent threat. They also used unreliable sources to create reports that ultimately proved to be false. [Mother Jones] [New Yorker] [Wikipedia]

By lying to Congress, Bush violated US Laws related to Fraud and False Statements, Title 18, Chapter 47, Section 1001 and Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, Title 18, Chapter 19, Section 371.

Resources

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration digg:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration spurl:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration wists:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration simpy:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration newsvine:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration blinklist:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration furl:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration reddit:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration fark:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration blogmarks:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration Y!:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration smarking:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration magnolia:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration segnalo:Top Iraq Lies Told by the Bush Administration

How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USA

I’ve read a lot online about how users of AllOfMP3.com are unhappy (and even upset) about not being able to buy credits anymore to purchase music from the USA. Apparently, political pressure from the media industry in the US forced the big name credit card companies to withdraw their service. So what can you do? Is there a way to buy more credits from the USA anymore?

Yes, there is! A website called SongBoom popped up that allows you to buy gift certificates easily with PayPal. So if you live in the USA and still want to use AllOfMP3.com, check it out! They charge more than the card is worth, however; but you’re still getting a good deal: a song that previously cost $0.15 would now cost $0.18 when you include the price of the added on fee. Definitely a site to bookmark if you are (or used to be) an AllOfMP3.com user!

Leave A Comment »
Share this post!
del.icio.us:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAdigg:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAspurl:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAwists:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAsimpy:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAnewsvine:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAblinklist:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAfurl:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAreddit:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAfark:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAblogmarks:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAY!:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAsmarking:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAmagnolia:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USAsegnalo:How to Buy Credits at AllOfMP3.com from the USA



Everything here copyright rob russell, heavygravity.com.